The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
The line graph below gives information about the quantity of closedown shops and also the figure for shops that could open from 2011 to 2018.
As can be seen from the graph, the number of closed shops and shops which were recently opened experienced a downward trend. Furthermore, the figure for opening shops occupied the last position throughout the period shown.
Regarding the number of newly-opened stores, it fell substantially from 2011 to 2012 by 4500 units. Although the dashed line had a fractional rise from 4000 to 6000 shops in 2 years, it then went down swiftly at 4000 stores in 2015 and remained stable the next 3 years. Following this, the quantity of recently opened stores had a moderate decrease at 3000 units in 2018.
On the other hand, the data for closed shop fluctuated from 6000 to 7000 shops in the first 4 years. Moreover, the line dropped dramatically in 2015 at 500 stores which were just above the bottom of the graph. Fortunately, the number of closing shops recovered to around 5000 units in 2016 and continued to slowly rise .
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below gives information about the quant...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...derate decrease at 3000 units in 2018. On the other hand, the data for closed s...
^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...its in 2016 and continued to slowly rise .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8097826087 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49039645578 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592391304348 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.915841736 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369935972401 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159518227771 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10033483684 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249971290647 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682198824949 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.