The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates how households in a specific country allocated income on different things between 1968 and 2018. Overall, food, fuel and power, clothing and footware and personal goods declined, a reverse pattern was true with the remaining categories. Additionally, it is also noticeable that people spent more money on leisure and housing in 2018 instead of food, like in 1968.
In 2018, 35% of the households’ income was spent on purchasing food weekly, the proportion of average wage spending every week on housing and clothing and footware was recorded at the same data, at 10% and the remaining categories witnessed a similar pattern with the figure being roughly 7%, except fuel and power with only 6% of income expenditure on this category.
After 40 years, the demand of people in this region had changed significantly. The weekly expense on food declined to about 17% and people in this country tended to allocate more budget deriving from their income on spare time, at 23% (a 13% increase). Additionally, housing and transport were also paid more attention by more people with more income expenditure with the figure being recorded at approximately 18% and 9% respectively. The weekly spending money on other categories also decreased considerably, at 5% or just below 5%, meanwhile housing stayed unchanged with the similar record in 1968 ( at 8%).
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that this is the responsibility of governments to solve the problem What extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'expenses'.
Suggestion: expenses
...n had changed significantly. The weekly expense on food declined to about 17% and peopl...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nchanged with the similar record in 1968 at 8%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17410714286 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80882341893 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584821428571 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.2984470946 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.875 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0511109753426 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229907078095 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0156308768173 0.0843802449381 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0365198319329 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00750940012707 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.