The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same to periods.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the number of people who visit Ashdown Museum before and after refurbishment, while the pie charts depict the percentage of results of surveys of visitor satisfaction in five distinct groups at the same time.
It is obvious that the number of visitors who visited this place during the year after refurbishment was more than before, while the percentage of dissatisfied and satisfied in order had the highest percent year before and year after recreate. The no-response group did not change during this time.
As can be seen, by increasing the visitors to around 18000 after recreate shown people have more tendency to visit this place after refurbishment and pie charts shown this exactly. The percentage of people who were dissatisfied decreased from 25 after recreating to 15 percent and the satisfied group by increasing 10 percent showed this issue. In addition, the very satisfied group has risen 20 percent from 15 to 35 and very dissatisfied declined to 5 percent. The no-response group has no change during these years.
In conclusion, people in society have been satisfied with the refurbishment of the Ashdown Museum and the number of them increased after recreating.
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 56
- The maps below shown an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information on the location and types of the dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17435897436 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82840852885 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5577756539 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.125 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334646380998 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139168320869 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101899544678 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220005297115 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690535355727 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.