The maps below shown an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates the current area in the town of Norbition and its development plan for the future.
It is obvious that the main square will not change in the new design but will add some new pathways to this place. All of the factories were replaced with housing and the middle of the town got crowded in the future plan.
As can be seen, there is not any change in the border of the city and its wide does not change. In the developed plan there is no factory and all of them are omitted but a school, playground, medical center, and shops are added in the new version of the town which facilities are near the middle square. Although the middle center doesn’t change three new paths add that end to this place and one of them passes the river in the farmland which is located a housing there and another way leads to the school. The last way is to link to a small squire that is added below the origin squire in the planned future development. Six housing areas were constructed around the town. There are new facilities that the farmland section can use and construct a path that link the town and farmland to each other.
In conclusion, the new plan of the town has more facilities and pathways that seems it is better than before scheme.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- The maps below shown an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...ll add some new pathways to this place. All of the factories were replaced with housing an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39655172414 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24003606965 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4910980303 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149100129896 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681508634074 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561058555228 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109963728537 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505820239426 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.