The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates average weekly spending by families over a 50-year period form 1968 to 2018. The data are measured in percentage of weekly income.
Overall, over 5 decade, there was a general upward trend in the family financial allocation. Noticeably, in 1968, the finance for food held the dominant proportion of the the total spending, while that for fuel and power hit the trough of the whole graph. In 50 years later, the top position in figures changed to spending for leisure, whereas the figures for fuel and power were still reported as the lowest.
Particularly, to begin with 1968, leading the total figures were those for food, recorded at a roughly 35%. The second top position went for housing, with it statistics less than one third of those for the former. Spending for clothing and footwear shared the same percentage with that for housing; while less than 10% of weekly income was recorded in each of 4 other sections, including household goods, personal goods, transport and leisure. Finally, fuel and power made for the smallest proportion of the whole chart, at only more than 5%.
In 2018, money spent on leisure led the whole chart, accounting for over 20%. In contrast, spending for food halved the counterpart in 1968; similarly, other 3 sections, including fuel and power, clothing and footwear, personal goods, underwent the similar pattern, decreasing to approximately 5%. Not only to leisure did the allocated money to housing and transport also surgered to nearly 20% and 15% respectively. Only the spending for household goods stood unchanged, remaining at more than 5% throughout the record period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- In the modern world schools are no longer necessary because there is so much information available through the internet that children can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in once country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 89
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun decade seems to be countable, so consider using: '5 decades'.
Suggestion: 5 decades
...ntage of weekly income. Overall, over 5 decade, there was a general upward trend in th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...or food held the dominant proportion of the the total spending, while that for fuel and...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...or food held the dominant proportion of the the total spending, while that for fuel and...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, second, similarly, so, still, third, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11524163569 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61146529191 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557620817844 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2583856231 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.846153846 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840351348243 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392928368057 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411927228955 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071004525569 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475252041111 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.