In order to improve the quality of education,high school students should be encouraged to evaluate and criticize their teachers,but some people think it will result in the loss of respect and discipline in classroom.Discuss both views and give your opinion
The dynamics of the education system have been changed rampantly over the years.In today's scenario, the education system is more transparent and flexible. In relation to this, some assert that student must evaluate and criticize their teacher but others presume that it lead to loss of respect and discipline. Both the aspects are discussed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with,Of late,the schools changed the system of teaching and learning. Proactive measures are taken to impart authentic training and learning. The higher authorities attributed certain paradigm under which a student could judge and challenge his/her teacher or the way of teaching. In the era of substantial competition, a student must be fully prepared to tackle the worst case scenario. Individualism plays a pivotal role but the helping hands that are the teachers, their role could not be shunned. If at any stage, if a student feel like bad guidance,or unsatisfactory teaching. An individual could directly ask the higher management to change the staff or particular teacher. However,in same school it becomes mandate to evaluate a teacher on certain regular basis.
Moving further,these kind of actions could probably lead to indiscipline and loss of respect. A class comprises of all kind of students. The mischivious one, may diabrately evaluate wrong. Also the gap between the students and the teachers must be maintained. The school management must hire the best teachers and should evaluate them
at the initial stage. To maintain the curriculum of the class,these methods must be vanished else the repercussion could be very bad.
To recapitulate, I would like to say that the teachers are considered as incarnation of God and judging a teacher is a wrong deed.Although if a student has a problem he/she must discuss with the same teacher.
- For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary but a form of entertainment Do you think it is a positive or a negative development Give your opinion and examples from your experience 61
- The table below gives the information about underground railway systems in six citiesSummarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison where relevant 70
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashion one.The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life. 60
- A ZOO DOES NOT SERVE ANY PRACTICAL PURPOSE.DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT.GIVE SPECIFIC REASONS AND EXAMPLES TO SUPPORT YOUR VIEW 60
- Crime is nearly always related to the environment in which occurs For this reason international laws and international courts are unrealistic and will not succeed in reducing crime levels in different countries Discuss 60
Individualism plays a pivotal role but the helping hands that are the teachers,
Individualism plays a pivotal role but the helping hands are the teachers,
if a student feel like bad guidance
if a student feels like bad guidance
Sentence: The mischivious one, may diabrately evaluate wrong.
Error: diabrately Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: mischivious Suggestion: mischievous
Always put a space after punctuation marks. Essay e-rater is sensitive.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 302 350
No. of Characters: 1501 1500
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.169 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.97 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.743 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 112 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.443 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.283 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.469 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5