The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores.
"Because of declining profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Raising prices is not a good option, since we are famous for our low prices. Instead, we should reduce our operating hours. Last month our store in downtown Marston reduced its hours by closing at 6:00 p.m. rather than 9:00 p.m. and reduced its overall inventory by no longer stocking any DVD released more than five years ago. Since we have received very few customer complaints about these new policies, we should now adopt them at all other Movies Galore stores as our best strategies for improving profits."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
While it might be true that reducing operating expenses might lead to increase in profits for Movies Galore's rental stores, the authors argument fails to present a cogent case for it. To responsibly evaluate the argument we need more evidence and consider other plausible factors involved.
For one, the author cites example of the store in downtown Marston reducing its operational cost by closing early. First, we will need to understand what constitutes of the operational expenses, is it the pay to the workers? electricity and utility charges? what percentage of the profits are operational expenses. It might turn out that even reduced operational costs have failed to increase profits at the Marston store.
For another, the sole example of store in downtown Maston cannot be used to generalize the effect. It could be so, that people in downtown have such working hours where closing the store at 6:00 PM won't reduce the profits. However, such might not be the case elsewhere. In areas where public living in surrounding areas is active during late evenings, any such desicion might prove disastorous. We will need information about public behaviour in areas surrounding the stores before we can evaluate the argument.
Furthermore, the idea of eliminating movies released more than 5 years ago seems unwarranted. Instead for putting faith in such unreasonable claims, we must ask what kind of movies are generally do not get rented out. More often than not it is the movies that were flops are the one who fail to make any profit. Old movies like Star wars are one of the most liked ones. If such be the case, it weakens the argument. It is suggestible that surveys are conducted among current customers to gauge their interests and understand their preferences.
Its easy to understand that the owner of the store has the good will of the store in mind. However in order to evaluate the argument responsibly, a lot more evidence must be collected and analysed before we make a claim and act on it. Understanding in detail factors like; What percent of total expenses is made of operational cost?; Do all stores have surrounding areas that can be represented by downtown Marston? Are all movies released more than 5 years ago actually non profitable? will surely help us evaluate the argument better.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-01 | ashika ramesh | 82 | view |
2019-02-06 | evanlu | 55 | view |
2019-01-02 | udayrade1206 | 35 | view |
2018-10-09 | chaitanyaok | 39 | view |
2018-08-12 | ribhunirek | 52 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores."Because of declining profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Raising prices is not a good option, since 80
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 70
Sentence: In areas where public living in surrounding areas is active during late evenings, any such desicion might prove disastorous.
Error: disastorous Suggestion: disastrous
Error: desicion Suggestion: decision
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 389 350
No. of Characters: 1884 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.441 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.843 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.615 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.45 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.241 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.45 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.304 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.517 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5