The ability to learn more than one language will be less
important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning more than one language and its corresponding
impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of
learning various languages is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both
constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to
believe that being bilingual can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning an official language can provide the society with
some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that globalization, as well as
different civilizations, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience,
when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered
more job opportunities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cognitive skills and the
vernacular apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of conversational science, speaking a dead language might increase
the consequences of culture shock. Moreover, fundamental aspects of knowing a
dominant language relate to this reality that the demerits of native language pertain to
the power of expression. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken
by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of practical experiences is
correlated negatively with mingling with people. Hence, it is correct to presume the
preconceived notion of broadening our horizons.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly
believe that the benefits of language learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do
the advantages of native language prove the significance of widely used around the
world, but also pinpoint career implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-19 | Mohammad1360 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83969465649 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29299741034 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664122137405 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5448218461 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21420050722 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673985115488 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582508165808 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478186330303 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705326686552 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.