A Cross-cultural study on Nature Connectedness, Leisure Attitude and Leisure Environment Preferences in Taiwan and Vietnam.
Many studies indicated that there is always a close relationship between human and nature. It is suggested that the natural environment can enhance physical and mental health including restoring attention， reducing stress and developing healthy lifestyle. Additional, people with high level of natural connection can be willing to participate outdour activities and get more health benefits. The natural environment can promote physical and mental health, help people regain attention, reduce stress, and develop healthy exercise habits. Natural connection refers to the degree of closeness between people and nature. Past studies have shown that people's preference for the natural environment is higher than that of the urban environment. Studies have pointed out that people with a high degree of natural connection will be more willing to contact nature with their leisure attitudes acquired in outdoor activities. They will also get better health benefits by engaging in leisure activities in the natural environment. This study intends to explore the relationship between people's natural connectivity, leisure attitudes and leisure environment preferences, and to further understand whether their relationship is affected by transnational issues and residential areas.
This research focuses on Taiwanese, Vietnamese in Taiwan, and Vietnamese in Vietnam (hereafter referred to as Taiwanese, Vietnamese in Taiwan, and Vietnamese) as subjects, and collects data on the research subjects on various websites. Using questionnaire surveys as a research tool, we can deeply understand each object’s views on natural connections and leisure attitudes, as well as their preference for leisure environments when participating in leisure activities, and then further cross-country comparisons to explore Taiwan and Vietnam’s views on natural connections and leisure Are there any differences in attitudes and preferences for choosing a leisure environment when participating in leisure activities? The research results show that natural connection and natural use are not affected by nationality; and the current place of residence will affect personal natural use. Research proves that Taiwanese are more willing to use nature than Vietnamese in natural use. This study also found that Taiwanese are better than Vietnamese and Vietnamese in Taiwan in terms of "cognition," "emotion," and "behavior." To sum up, there are significant differences in leisure attitudes among recipients of different nationalities, and different nationalities and different places of residence also have an impact on all aspects of leisure attitudes. When choosing the leisure environment preference, the current residence has an impact on the urban leisure environment preference, regardless of nationality; on the contrary, nationality has a difference in preference for natural and mixed leisure environments. Taiwanese prefer a leisure environment with beautiful natural environment and a mixed leisure environment with natural elements, while the urban leisure environment is favored by the tested Vietnamese. The results of the research can be helpful in the future for the promotion of natural leisure activities in Vietnam and the reference basis for Taiwan's tourism and leisure activities in planning the "southward" policy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-21 | Mia.nguyen | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1094, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...se in Taiwan in terms of 'cognition,' 'emotion,' and 'behavio...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... of 'cognition,' 'emotion,' and 'behavior.' To sum up, t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1651, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
...d mixed leisure environments. Taiwanese prefer a leisure environment with beautiful na...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, well, while, as well as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.3376753507 360% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2876.0 1615.20841683 178% => OK
No of words: 478.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01673640167 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39822889084 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424686192469 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 930.6 506.74238477 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 0.809619238477 1112% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.560248241 49.4020404114 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.176470588 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1176470588 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463374545507 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160113083319 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120790074545 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360112980133 0.151304729494 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957443174198 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 11.3001002004 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.