How COVID 19 has changed working enviroment
When looking back, we also see the change of working environment after the pandemic appeared. Most things like workplace, corporate culture, organization, or team activities are different from 2 years ago. There is no denying, these changes affect both positively and negatively.
However, in my experience, it has changed for the better.
The first is workplace expansion.
During the pandemic, employees have been advised to work from home instead of going to an office. So, any space in the house like a bedroom or kitchen can become a place to work. It is the premise so that the companies towards hybrid working environments in the future, where teams can work remotely and in the office.
The second is the improvement in the relationship between manager and staff.
Leaders are switching their focus from office culture to a more supportive culture, with a new focus on how to improve the lives of employees while still getting the best from them.
One example of this is how Hisense Mexico embraced home working and supporting its team. Their top priority has been to keep team members at home and safe, while also holding them motivated, engaged, and informed. Hisense encouraged open communication by holding regular virtual meetings, sending newsletters, and even throwing virtual birthday parties.
Thirdly, the increase in employee freedom.
Employees are allowed a degree of autonomy to get on with their work and have more time to concentrate on their workload. They feel more comfortable because the working relationship isn't as closely monitored.
Nevertheless, COVID-19 also has some negative impacts on the working environment.
Firstly, the communication between employees was restricted.
While people meet other coworkers, they can not only expand their relationships but also become more sociable. Conversely, working at home may isolate people from society the decline of social skills, especially teamwork. At work, they can enhance their resources through connecting with other staff as teams or groups; whereas, they have to resolve difficulties alone at home.
Secondly, working methods became more unprofessional.
The rise of Zoom meetings and remote working has given us an insight into team member’s private spaces. Every video call and virtual meeting makes the personal lives of colleagues, managers, and clients visible. We can see children or pets on-screen, interrupting meetings and phone calls regularly. It might seem like a distraction to the working day.
To summarize, I would like you to take a look at the main point again. Our working environment has changed so much because of COVID-19. We should notice not only negative changes but also positive ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-16 | chinguyen.1605 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | chinguyen.1605 | view | |
| 2021-09-16 | chinguyen.1605 | view |
- Student Plan
- Talk about a marketing campaign that impressed you 80
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of traveling to a workplace every day Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Student Plan
- How COVID 19 changed the working enviroment
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h positively and negatively. However, in my experience, it has changed for the...
^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter. The first is workplace expansion. During the pandemic, employees have been...
^^^
Line 10, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...rtable because the working relationship isnt as closely monitored. Nevertheless, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37236533958 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82230459017 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 176.041082164 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6018735363 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 16.0721442886 180% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.132253098 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1034482759 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.724137931 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68965517241 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 4.38176352705 342% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252644876036 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659320677203 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832150195269 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819403225976 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783730274439 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.