the reasons why careful planning is important and how they can positively impact on life in the city
In recent years, many cities have developed a systematic way. As a result, the infrastructure of this city is facing some very serious problems. The best way to solve this problem that's were of careful planning for the development of the city. In this article I will look at the reasons why careful planning is important and how they can positively impact on life in the city.
Firstly, it is common in many countries, especially in developed countries, a row of cars on the road that have difficulty in congestion, traffic transport. The main reason for this is that the infrastructure of roads in these countries is very thick and can not afford more cars and other vehicles. If the government to improve infrastructure for the transport system with a careful plan, there is no doubt that most of the traffic problems will be improved.
Secondly, we can observe a significant increase in the number of factories in major cities, which negatively affects many aspects of life there. What I mean by this is that factories in many cities are built in secluded places and is a factory pollution from spreading throughout the city. Although the factories are built in various places in the city can allow people to go back to work which is a short distance to their house, I think it is more advisable to move to a where to accumulate all of the pollution in this place. Of course, it does not mean that any measure is not taken to reduce pollution completely in this place to provide working conditions safer for workers. think about the protection of people's living environment.
which need careful planning plays an important role in the development of the city. While it can reduce traffic congestion significantly, it also can improve air quality, the environment there. people can safely live without having to worry about problems in treatment, the current congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-04 | quangtom2002 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ems. The best way to solve this problem thats were of careful planning for the develo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...isable to move to a where to accumulate all of the pollution in this place. Of course, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Think
...e working conditions safer for workers. think about the protection of peoples living ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...otection of peoples living environment. which need careful planning plays an importan...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...tection of peoples living environment. which need careful planning plays an importan...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ove air quality, the environment there. people can safely live without having to worry...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, i mean, i think, no doubt, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8625 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8152417192 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1584863441 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296904767982 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966102269774 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15036186843 0.0667982634062 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183319178787 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141640006389 0.056905535591 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.