Requirements-driven software development process governance
Governing a requirements-driven software development process such as (I-) Tropos or even waterfall, V, UP-based ones allows IT managers to propose rules for efficient handling of information and resources to cope with stakeholders' requirements. Requirements engineering is closely intertwined with IT Governance. Aligning IT Governance principles with Requirements-Driven Software Development allows proposing governance and management rules for evaluating software development in alignment with stakeholders’ long-term strategy. On the one hand, IT Governance in software engineering has to ensure that software organization business processes meet the strategic requirements of the organization. On the other hand, requirements-driven software methods are development processes using high-level social-oriented models to drive the software life cycle in terms of both project management and deductive iterative engineering techniques. Typically, such methods are well-suited for the inclusion and adaptation of governance principles immediately into the software development life cycle. To consolidate both perspectives, this chapter presents the research approach and methodology for proposing a process framework called GI-Tropos to extend I-Tropos allowing aligning requirements-driven software processes with IT governance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-09 | HappyCandy | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | Oladipograce | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-22 | peachfully | 58 | view |
| 2020-07-01 | Sathi umesh | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-01 | Rajajanak | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 171.0 315.596192385 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.79532163743 5.12529762239 133% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.95725424428 2.80592935109 141% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 176.041082164 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.2 1.60771543086 137% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5282865228 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.0 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.570861527232 0.244688304435 233% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283910981386 0.084324248473 337% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105701615947 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.570861527232 0.151304729494 377% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 13.0946893788 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: -3.64 50.2224549098 -7% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.3001002004 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 22.46 12.4159519038 181% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.75 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.