1. Some people think that experiential learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education; however, others think that traditional form of teaching is the best. Discuss whether or not you think experiential learning can work well in high school and college?
The importance of experiential learning is always a hot potato for all of us due to various reason as some people prefer the traditional method of education in spite of the practical one. I personally believe that getting knowledge with practice and doing by will be more helpful as compared to old techniques of learning.
First and foremost, there are myriad reasons behind my perspective view of learning method, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact is that a student is capable to grasp quickly and effectively if he learns with practice. Moreover, practical knowledge, directly or indirectly improve the insights and other characteristics of pupil such as creativity, problem-solving capacity and understanding of an individual on a particular question, and its way of answering because
On the other hand, people who has an opposite view and tend to pursue that traditional learning method is the best also has their own convenient reasons, but from all of them, support from teachers and peers to solve any queries should be considered as the best technique of learning. Here, a detailed explanation of any topic is given to student by their mentors, as a result, they can easily understand the topic.
In conclusion, no one denies the fact that both methods have their unique benefits. Despite of that in my perspective learning by doing will be able to increase our insights, and we shall remember the things for a long-time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-29 | jagu | 69 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | bikashkatwal | 89 | view |
- 1 Some people think that experiential learning learning by doing can work well in formal education however others think that traditional form of teaching is the best Discuss whether or not you think experiential learning can work well in high school and c 69
- 1 Some people think that experiential learning learning by doing can work well in formal education however others think that the traditional form of teaching is the best Discuss whether or not you think experiential learning can work well in high school a
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estion, and its way of answering because On the other hand, people who has an opp...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...s, and we shall remember the things for a long-time.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remember the things for a long-time.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07083333333 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99095569546 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.5024630542 166% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 142.161736004 50.4703680194 282% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.857142857 104.977214359 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 20.9669160288 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7142857143 7.25397266985 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164076025894 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676241942049 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516740738173 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935394343481 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293660680781 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 12.6369458128 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.3980295567 150% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.5123152709 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.