Air travel can benefit the richest people in the world. ordinary people can get no advantage with development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of travelling by air among rich and ordinary people which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This will further elaborate both aspects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant stems from the fact that travelling by air is beneficial for rich people because they often visit other countries by air as well as they have more money for travelling therefore they like to travel by air further more they do imports and exports businesses in other countries because of that they go by travel. Another pivotal aspects of this argument is that rich people wants to enjoy their life with money therefore they like to travel by air. Needless to say all these merits stand travelling by air among rich and ordinary people.
However there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming is that ordinary people cannot travel by air because they have not money for travelling by air as well as they have no business in other countries because of that ordinary people cannot handle expenditure for buy air tickets. Besides, ordinary people have simple lifestyle than richest people they cannot afford air travelling. Hence it is apparent why many are against travelling by air among rich ad ordinary people.
According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of travelling by air among rich and ordinary people are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | Nobal hundal | 72 | view |
- Give the opinion weather formal written examination is an effective way to assess students. 84
- LARGE SHOPPING MALLS SHOULD BE REPLACE LOCAL SHOP? DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE. 77
- Foreign languages should be made a compulsory in the primary school.How far do you agree with the above statement? 55
- Air travel can benefit the richest people in the world. ordinary people can get no advantage with development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 72
- Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don’t need. Give your opinion about this practice. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...y air among rich and ordinary people. However there are some pitfalls that negate the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'than the richest'.
Suggestion: than the richest
..., ordinary people have simple lifestyle than richest people they cannot afford air travellin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to air'
Suggestion: to air
... than richest people they cannot afford air travelling. Hence it is apparent why ma...
^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ople they cannot afford air travelling. Hence it is apparent why many are against tra...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13148788927 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61957599132 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467128027682 0.580463131201 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.039352356 50.4703680194 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.3 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9 20.9669160288 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355678801419 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16647963537 0.0925447433944 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936637456881 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238429093 0.151781067708 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659776686994 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.