Animal rights are important. Give your opinions.
Recently, the phenomenon of important animal rights and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of vulnerable creatures are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that wild animal can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the magnitude of animal rights can provide society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of beautiful nature, are significant. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of endangered species. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of rational opinions are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, animal rights can supply the community with negative influences which are associated with the reality that the demerits of negligible rights are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described an appalling zoo. Hence, predicted outcomes of inefficient environments are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of important animal rights far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of biodiversity prove the significance of a protected area, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-26 | PTE STUDY | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-24 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 55 | view |
| 2022-05-24 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 55 | view |
| 2022-02-17 | amolsharma44 | 77 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
- What is the role of writing theater plays and discussing ancient writings in the study of high school students 68
- Nowadays more and more people believed that overburden can help complete higher quality in achievements For example professional teachers coaches believe that this applies to students and athletes on the individual and national level What is your point of 85
- Is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries 88
- What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world 77
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on the student s work if it is late 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7149321267 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24940441015 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656108597285 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3509786643 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.818181818 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248329443462 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797054887383 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765418040069 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137662656986 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233492197942 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7149321267 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24940441015 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656108597285 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3509786643 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.818181818 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248329443462 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797054887383 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765418040069 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137662656986 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233492197942 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.