Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believes that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform.
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on the increasing rate of taking human jobs by robots can lead to though-provoking discussions. Irrespective to the numerous arguments that exit on either side, my opinion is that there is a significant increase on this rate; however, some human jobs cannot be totally replaced.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, humans are genuine creatures who are created by god, and their unique role is to develop the world around them and save some people lives. It is also important to note that if there is a critical surgery at hospital, robot will not be trusted as a human doctor to do it for the patient. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that robots have some extent in special jobs, and they cannot be operated in their own.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that there are some situations at real life which robots cannot take the correct action in them. First and foremost, humans acquire their experience from their previous tackled problems; therefore, robots do not have such data to face new situations. This exemplifies that we cannot depend on the robots in all situations.
In conclusion, I see that there is equally evidence to support the arguments I have provided, and hence, my opinion is that we cannot deny robots importance in our life, but humans cannot be replaced for some certain jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | architakamjps@gmail.com | 79 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | viviana | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-19 | mohab.elhaddad | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | AmirTheGreat | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | pippipeo | 72 | view |
- Life experience is a better teacher than school or foreign education. Give an example and support opinion. 77
- Many institutes and universities practice written examination and not computer-based tests for their students. Your opinion on that. 77
- Universities should penalize the students for the late submission of their work. Do you agree or disagree and represent your viewpoints in this regard 80
- Companies involve employees in decision making policy. Is this a good approach? Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people believe that TV is a useful invention. To what extent you agree with the statement. Give your opinion and explain with the observations and examples from your personal experience. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94758064516 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76533833804 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584677419355 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8599037304 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.7 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306762664405 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119843833626 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610818381897 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188135183575 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352235104367 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.