Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views.

Recently, the phnomenon of using Internet instead of tradition classroms and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate Although contested by many that online education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that applying web instead of classroom tutors is a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From the social standpoint, using Internet to teach pupils can provide the society with some noticeable benefits which are rooted in the fact that reducing terafic congestion, as well as saving energy, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered huge ecconomic impact while eliminating school classes. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both social and personal issues apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of education, spreading Internet and substituting teachers might increase the consequences of improved quality of study. Moreover, fundamental aspects of technology related to this reality that the demerits of implementing web education pertain to the knowledge available online. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of Internet application.

To conclude, while there are severl compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of replacing classroom teacher with Internet far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only tdo the advantages of web teaching prove the significance of eliminating teachers, but also pinpoint technology implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86192468619 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16659287662 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682008368201 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1027733146 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.1 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173269531609 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600447377338 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058411237384 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942741225702 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355922569212 0.0609392437508 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.45 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.