In a cashless society, people use
more credit cards. What are the
advantages and disadvantages of this
phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of a cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of a bank loan is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that an electronic banking can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a cashless system of payment could provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of a financial organization as well as unsecured credit cards are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered the credit analysis. thus, the beneficial ramifications of a commercial bank apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a method of payment might increase the consequences of credit cards. moreover, the fundamental aspects of credit card debt could relate to this reality that the demerits of a bank balance pertain to the charging credit cards. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of short-term credits is correlated negatively with an acceptable credit card. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a cheque card.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a cash ratio far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a valid card prove the significance of the client account, but also pinpoint credit card's implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-15 | Parand Pajouhesh | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...t which discovered the credit analysis. thus, the beneficial ramifications of a comm...
^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...rease the consequences of credit cards. moreover, the fundamental aspects of credit card...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3171641791 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1451904005 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619402985075 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6802865157 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126098689698 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429686501932 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431876097569 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670254638309 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475911656129 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.