It is undeniable to say that, medicine heals body and music heals soul. Certain scientific studies and theoretical approaches have confirmed that learning certain types of background music is beneficial and great productive tool to enhance the learning and cognitive abilities, while other believes that it has several loopholes. This essay describe both negative and postive aspects hereunder to form a stance.
To set the wheels in motion, there are multiple glaring and reinforced rich rewards of listening background music in academic and non-academic training. Firstly, the most evident and distinctive one stems from the fact that musical training boosts the brain power and cognitive function in children as well as in adults. To quote an epitome, evidences are mounting that, it improve the mental alertness and memory in reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Secondly, another underlying, salient and remarkable feature is that, the musical smart class system is used in the primary schools for the pupils to easily grasp the tables, rhymes, vocabulary, alphabets, counting and tables. Therefore, it encourages the verbal memory and childhood literacy. Sometimes music act as relief tonic and fight against stress and fear.
What prompts the cynics to contradict is the fact that, there are some raesonable issues associated with this trends. Firstly, the most predominant concern is that, sometimes learners get puzzled between lyrics of the song and books. During exam preparations, they also get confused in memorizing the historical dates, formulas, concepts, definitions, theorems and important events while listening to the songs at the same time. Secondly, it is worth pointing out that the addiction of background music affects the eardrums leads to psychological discomfort in the case of unavailabilty.
To conclude, as every rose has some thorns on its stem, similarly, accessing the background music during any mental task has no exception. It may prove productive and counterproductive, Therefore, we should harness it resourcefully, which is not impractical or unattainable rather feasible and comprehensive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'describes'.
Suggestion: describes
...at it has several loopholes. This essay describe both negative and postive aspects hereu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improves'?
Suggestion: improves
...pitome, evidences are mounting that, it improve the mental alertness and memory in read...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... some raesonable issues associated with this trends. Firstly, the most predominant c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 8.36945812808 251% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1207.87684729 151% => OK
No of words: 323.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6346749226 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98794172017 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640866873065 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 379.143842365 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2708080475 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132094869574 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361608818208 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500856510207 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761371081269 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603686341045 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.