Company’s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision-making process. Discus Organizations involve employees in decision making process of their products and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both.

Recently, the phenomenon of company's top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debated. Although contested by many that the matter of employees decision making is highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the company promotions can be a plus, I will analyze throughout this essay.

From the social stand point, organizations involving employees can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the choice of advises as well as increasing company reputation are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when i was a university student, I performed an experiment which discovered the major relationship between the company authorities and employees. Thus the beneficial ramifications of both the sales of products and services apparently can be seen.

within the realm of psychology, employees decision making might increase the consequence of company secrets out. Moreover the fundamental aspects of employees demanding the authorities relate to this reality that the demerits of degrading authority employee relationships pertain to downfall of company. As a tangible example, some scientific research has undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of products and services correlated negatively with company status.

To conclude, while there is several compelling arguments on both sides. I am profoundly believe that the benefits of authorities involving employees in decision making far outweigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages prove the significance of improving sales of products and services. But also pinpoint company relation implications.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...p. According to my own experience, when i was a university student, I performed a...
^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... the company authorities and employees. Thus the beneficial ramifications of both th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...and services apparently can be seen. within the realm of psychology, employees deci...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...the consequence of company secrets out. Moreover the fundamental aspects of employees de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...rguments on both sides. I am profoundly believe that the benefits of authorities invol...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... profoundly believe that the benefits of authorities involving employees in decis...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.843866171 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18987702464 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620817843866 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0105922695 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417255597446 0.242375264174 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126843687554 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122201565977 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231392688547 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940268125581 0.0609392437508 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.