do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? what is the reason for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of extreme skiing is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that bungee jumping can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, activity management can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of skydiving, as well as football, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of skydiving. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both skiing improvements and bungee jumping developments apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, dangerous issues might increase the consequences of skydiving developments. Moreover, fundamental aspects of extreme skiing analysis could relate to this reality that the demerits of bungee jumping facts pertain to skiing requirements. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of N12 is correlated negatively with supports issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of activities strategies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of reasons strategies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of skiing facts prove the significance of bungee jumping issues, but also pinpoint skydiving management implications.
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children's act. What is your opinion? 85
- A healthy diet is more effective for keeping fit than exercise. What is your opinion? 11
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 11
- Some people think that technology improves the quality of life whereas others feel that creates a new problem that threatens the quality of life. Discuss both views and suggest your opinion. 88
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyze that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, activity manag...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76892430279 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25744419499 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649402390438 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9060309079 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209957777447 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643781159341 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284110499491 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1146975713 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116589028742 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.