Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? what are the reasons for that?

Recently, the phenomenon of doing dangerous sports and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although a group of people are in favour of dangerous activities as a necessary enthusiastic activity in life, some have an opponent view. I am inclined to believe that doing sports is crucial for a healthier lifestyle and I will discuss the advantages of gentle sport and the disadvantageous of risk-taking sports.

First, light exercises have various merits such as healthier lifestyle and preventing depression. Moreover, healthier lifestyle prevents obesity and physical disease as well as emotional impacts. Besides gentle sports act as a deterrent toward depression. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that everyday exercise has a significant impact on longevity and humans' health. Thus, the beneficial consequences of gentle sports can be observed.

On the other hand, there is some kind of sports which are influenced human body negatively such as adventurous sports. These sports not only are harmful to health and body but also most of the time is well-known as lucrative sports and advertised only because of economic purpose and neglect whether it is harmful or beneficial for human's body. According to my personal experience, most of the people around me do dangerous sports for showoff or develop their self-confidence. Hence, it is correct to presume some kind of sports has a negative impact on humans life.

To conclude, I profoundly believe that supporting dangerous activities such as bungee jumping has a financial purpose and truly has no benefits for human's health.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...ding to my personal experience, most of the people around me do dangerous sports for showoff or deve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...kind of sports has a negative impact on humans life. To conclude, I profoundly beli...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ruly has no benefits for humans health.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, kind of, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42307692308 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06503472571 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0259767147 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134466838332 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482728733629 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606532385588 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101441995629 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729432056653 0.0609392437508 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.