Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing??What are the reasons for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of risky sports and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of dangerous activities is highly beneficial, this issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that lucrative sports can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a societal standpoint, dangerous activities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in improving self-confidence, as well as adventurous, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered physical characteristics. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both mental problems and stressful situations apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of educational science, dangerous activities might increase the consequences of intellectual abilities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical skill relate to this reality that the demerits of detrimental problems pertain to life-threatening sports. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that downside of dangerous sports is correlated negatively to risk-taking sports. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of mental features.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of dangerous sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of economic and cultural benefits prove the significance of lucrative sports, but also pinpoint body balance implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | Mehdi.Babaie | 88 | view |
| 2018-03-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-02-18 | Azzita | 88 | view |
| 2018-02-18 | Azzita | 88 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 11
- More information available online so library's books are useless? Agree or disagree? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- in a cashless society, people use more credit cards. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- which is the most pressing problem in the today's world? discuss problems and solutions. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9670781893 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46431182453 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662551440329 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.789897974 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.096597579397 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307363659047 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348900153252 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0540629197812 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00899475636706 0.0609392437508 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.