Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

These days. there is a controversial debate between members of society about the responsibilities of consumers and producers in packaging products. There are a great number of people who interpret the responsibility of avoiding packaged products as thoroughly of the consumers, while others hold an opponent's view. In this essay I elucidate my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.

First of all, it is argued that the consumers should avoid the packaged products. This is attributed to the fact that the consumers play a pivotal role in the products' life cycle, therefore they would create a feeling of accomplishment and confidence, which consequently open avenues to new achievements so that the customer's enthusiasm and determination would be amplified towards many daunting tasks. Take mobile phones for example, even the small phones have a big packaging.

On the other hand, it is claimed that the producers are responsible to avoid extra packaging. This is to say that the manufacturers are the main part of the production line, therefore, they would instill a strong feeling of self-esteem so that customers are more likely to do up to expectations in society. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale University in 2015 found that the packaging of products would enhance the consumer's intellectual abilities to make better decisions in their purchases.

To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounded the view that avoiding the packaging of products by producers would enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of this packaging and would increase the customer's confidence. It is expected that manufacturers take cognizance of these facts and begin to adopt more efficient methods of packaging.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
These days. there is a controversial debate between membe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...he consumers play a pivotal role in the products life cycle, therefore they would create...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...avenues to new achievements so that the customers enthusiasm and determination would be a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...f this packaging and would increase the customers confidence. It is expected that manufac...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43542435424 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23184040732 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560885608856 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.1442474171 50.4703680194 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.909090909 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242109937811 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091066276265 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760051043903 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152357209497 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338547725022 0.0609392437508 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.