Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
Over packaged products create a lot of problems for the environment. Some people believe that producers are responsible for these commodities while opponents think consumers should not buy these products. This essay explains the responsibility of both consumers and producers.
First, producers are responsible for what they manufacture. Environmental researchers of Harvard University conducted an experiment to test the hypothesis that buyers trust manufacturers. After analyzing data, they concluded that trust is positively correlated with customer behaviour. Those who trust producers are three times more likely to buy what is produced, regardless of the packaging. In other words, the more you trust, the less you choose on what to buy. The difference between these two groups were statistically significant. The results were consistent across different studies.
Second, customer behaviour is another significant predictor of the popularity of over packaged products. In a recent study, marketing researchers undertook a project to investigate the relationship between customers’ choices and the intention to buy. The findings revealed that if customers make informed decisions, they will not buy over packaged products. However, the relationship did not prove to be causal.
In a nutshell, producers and customers both have a pivotal role in producing and consuming over packaged products. Corporations should take responsibility for being environmentally friendly and customers should be sensitive to what they buy and what the consequences of buying over packaged products are. In the meanwhile, the media and NGOs should be committed to informing and educating people to facilitate the process of implementing such a dramatic change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism? 78
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 77
- Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level.'To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own e 85
- Students should be required to stay in school until the age of eighteen.'To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Over packaged products create a lot of p...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility of both consumers and producers. First, producers are responsible for wha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8828125 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26943557581 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6587411835 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5882352941 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0588235294 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 7.25397266985 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30445124174 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896328718931 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860491153028 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197713276256 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113608495402 0.0609392437508 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 53.1260098522 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.23 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.