Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss you views with examples.
Recently, remaining English as a global has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question,” what are the positive and negative consequences?” Whereas it is a widely held view that uses English as a global language for communication is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the linguistical standpoint, language developments are bound up inextricably with trading policies, which indicates they lead to both sources of communication and international language. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between globalization and information exchange crisis as well as an exponential increase in academic achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the majority of developed countries are correlated positively with not only irreversible changes but also adverse outcomes.
Within the realm of sociology science, without the slightest doubt, efficient training systems attribute to alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down to governmental interventions, cultural implications, and international institutions. A salient example of such attribution is non-governmental organizations, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take means of communication. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint localization problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to worldwide, the second language, and even mother tongue language. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal rule of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I highly agree that remain English as a global language is of high importance. However, we perceive that with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
- What is the most significant invention and its corresponding to last 100 years; the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explainwhy? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience. 11
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 88
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 11
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree? 16
- It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree to disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
Recently, remaining English as a global has sparked an ongoing controversy, whi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...hich inevitably leads to a moot question,' what are the positive and negative con...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, second, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00680272109 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.61491503604 2.71678728327 133% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676870748299 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.1773920559 50.4703680194 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.166666667 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169734568711 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427826938585 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684448116891 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106584622716 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878044091152 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 23.0 9.94827586207 231% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.