As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree?

The importance of online reading which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial which others reject this notion. The substantial influence of traditional books has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend in the recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my reasons for following the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion, in the upcoming paragraphs.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument, but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that people can obtain vast knowledge just with one click. Hence, just by connecting their computer or electronics device with internet they can find any information of any particular topic that they need. Moreover, internet offer countless information at one place. Consequently, masses can save their crucial time instead of purchasing and finding the books in market. Apart from this, e-books are cheaper then traditional books.
Elaborating my view points, this trend has some more merits, but one of crucial one is that a single device able to store thousands of books. As a ramification, e-books are not required huge area for storing as the paper materials. Finally, user can set the size and font according to his requirement on computer but such a advantage is not possible in traditional books. Hence, it is apparent from the above that why many people are in the favour of online reading.
After hashing out the aforementioned deliberation, as one can reach a conclusion that the merits of e-books are instrumental indeed.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 520, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cheaper than'?
Suggestion: cheaper than
...in market. Apart from this, e-books are cheaper then traditional books. Elaborating my view...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 528, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...t. Apart from this, e-books are cheaper then traditional books. Elaborating my view...
^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...to his requirement on computer but such a advantage is not possible in traditiona...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, hence, if, moreover, so, then, thus, apart from, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20072992701 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83547518913 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6415701207 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0939898656765 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396286522375 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441988439409 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644239815628 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132958154763 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.