Education should teach us ethics and life values that will be practical for future employment. What is your opinion?
The controversial topic with respect to the role of education never fails to attract public attention. There has been a heated debate on whether schools should educate us ethics and life values which are essential for one’s future. Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, personally, I am the advocate of the view that education should prepare the qualified candidates for society.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that teaching ethics and life values is an essential part of education, due to the fact that one the most important function of education is to provide the society with students with moral values. This is because citizens should assume the responsibility for and be prepared to contribute to their communities and the whole society, and without them there will be too much violence and dishonesty in society. For instance, some scientific researches undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the crime rate of one city is closely related to its citizens’ education level. As a result, teaching students ethics and life values is an inevitable responsibility of education.
In contrast, it is commonly believed as a fact that subjects like math, science and language are far more important because in this competitive job market, strong academic background is vital for one’s future career. Nevertheless, this argument does not hold full water. It should be pointed out that apart from academic background, ethics, such as honesty, respect and cooperation, and life values are also keys to success in workplace. Employers are seeking for talents with high moral standard.
In a nutshell, based on the foregoing discussion, obviously, education should equip students with good ethics and positive life values, which is critical for their future career and the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, apart from, for instance, in contrast, such as, as a result, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38095238095 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93349550875 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578231292517 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9635592428 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338067956321 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117790987559 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765109724479 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205121183899 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533392621145 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.