Recently, the phenomenon of the effects of combing study and employment on effective learning and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly
beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the requirements of effective learning can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the benefits of time, comfort, and peace for effective learning can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are
inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the distracted ways of effective learning requirements might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly
believe that the benefits of not combing study and employment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages
of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 77
- What are the advantages and the disadvantages of being over competitive to individuals and society 84
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 79
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omfort, and peace for effective learning can provide the society with some notice...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77307692308 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27255713128 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638461538462 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6488642268 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.454545455 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.12807881773 194% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160870180236 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05392909866 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558595472381 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065172108778 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563700427157 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.