The environment we are living is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think is responsible for this ? Is it governments, organization or each individual? What measures?
Nowadays, environmental degradation is on rise, which has attracted many controversies and drawn attention from public. It can be agreed that deforestation is the main cause, while on the other hand, stands a perpective that individuals are solely responsible for this havoc. This essay will elaborate how pollution has caused catastrophic effects and how it can be treated by afforestation and, thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons how our individuals have polluted the environment and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that more and more trees are now cut down by man. As an illustration, we have seen the adverse effects of urbanization and industrialization on the environment due to deforestation. Furthermore, there is an increase in industrial wastes and effluents which have posed a threat to fauna. Hence, the greedy needs of man have led to this menace.
Approaches to deal with the setbacks originated by environmental pollution are numerous and the most effective one is to resort to afforestation. For instance, it is often cited that trees maintain the ecological balance at all levels. In addition, governments and authorities should take initiate awareness programs to educate people to grow and save more trees. By this way, the harmful consequences of pollution can be alleviated.
In the light of the above discussion, it can be concluded that the impact of environmental pollution is prominent which can be reduced by the concerted efforts of governments, organizations and individuals
- Do you think playing no smoking cautionary videos in the film are relevant 63
- Many people think that region affects successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to ? 77
- What are the positive and negative effects of today’s communication? 85
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producers to avoid over-packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example of your own experience. 77
- The environment we are living is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think is responsible for this ? Is it governments, organization or each individual? What measures? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed efforts of governments, organizations and individuals
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32258064516 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33305583306 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584677419355 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6758101114 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112298323059 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386981699323 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03556500967 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648196006615 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211014285026 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.