The environment we are living in is a danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual?
Nowadays, the influence of the environment that we are living is in danger has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “The environment we are living in is the danger due. Who should be the responsible; Governments, organizations or each individual?”. It is a widely held view that the problems with the environment cannot be solved in one day or one year, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the Government it is not the only one responsible for environmental problems. Therefore, I express several reasons why support this idea. First and foremost is that Government should impose more tax on the people that not separated the garbage in recycling bins as the population in Japan do because the Japan Government have extreme control in garbages. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that organizations could pay more tax to avoid the problems in air, and Government could apply more penalties when the organizations do not take care of the environment.
However, undoubtedly that each individual could help the environment avoiding use cars, using more public transport and avoiding put the smoke garbage in the same place as normal garbage’s. It should be taken into account that not only the Government is responsible for environmental problems. Moreover, it is quite clear that global warming is the big issue in 21st century’s.
In conclusion, I entirely agree to believe that everyone need take responsibilities to solve environmental problems. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-30 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
| 2018-02-26 | Danielee Goncalves | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-26 | Danielee Goncalves | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-26 | Danielee Goncalves | 77 | view |
- 1.The environment we are living in is danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual? 77
- What is the most pressing problem faced by its inhabitants and plant and what’s the solution? 72
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts, to what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- The environment we are living in is a danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual? 77
- 1.The environment we are living in is danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t we are living is in danger has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22789115646 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22798434308 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554421768707 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3962096621 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.083333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324165014241 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107353183435 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103543798874 0.071462118173 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169047029801 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963652595 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.