The food travels thousands of miles from farm to consumer. Some people think it would be better to our environment and economy if people only ate local produced food. What extent do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?

Recently, the phenomenon of consuming locally produced food to help our environment and economy has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of importing goods could be highly beneficial, this issue has been regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that local production could be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, increasing farms to produce more food for local consumption can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that economic issues, as well as environmental concerns, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which discovered political decisions. Thus, beneficial ramification of both government funds and global warming apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of industry, using locally produced food might increase the consequences of technological limitations. Moreover, fundamental aspects of greenhouse gases relate to this reality that the demerits of an increased rate of unemployment pertain to lack of federal investments. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of exporting food is correlated negatively with a higher price. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of local production.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of consuming locally produced food far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this issue prove its significance, but also pinpoint to general implications.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61363636364 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23558468665 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9059342372 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217640371309 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705088900718 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613673049034 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119821263569 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240604997108 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.