How does the design of building effect, either positively or negatively, where people work and live?
The controversial topic with respect to building design never fails to attract public attention.
There has been a heated debate on whether the design of the building affects people's life positively or negatively.
From my perspective, I tend to believe that the design of the building has a significant effect on people's lives, and the design of the building should be positive.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that an excellent design of building has a positive effect that due to the fact that reasonable design can make people work and live safer.
This is because a well-designed building has a number of safety facilities.
For example, emergency exit will help people evacuate the building safely and quickly during the fire drill.
In addition, people can work more efficiently in a construction which has a professional design, which means the working area is essay to find and access for the staff.
As a result, a well-designed building can improve the efficiency of the use of the building.
In contrast, the bad design of the building has a severe impact on people's daily life.
It should be pointed out that the unreasonable design residential building affects people's health condition.
That is to say that people will feel stressful in that poorly designed building.
For instance, residents will get an insomnia, which will cause mental health problems, such as depression.
Therefore, an unreasonable design building will have a negative effect.
Given all the points discussed above, I conclude my opinion that the design of the building has a significant effect on people's lives.
A well-designed building can make people live more safely and efficiently, and a bad-designed building can even affect people's health condition.
- Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- How does the design of building effect, either positively or negatively, where people work and live? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, with respect to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33802816901 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93340926275 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489436619718 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4882588717 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 4.12807881773 363% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397743790329 0.242375264174 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160866942751 0.0925447433944 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798088600884 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160866942751 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798088600884 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.