If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose?
Recently, climate change has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what is my preferable subject of study?” Whereas it is a widely held view that greenhouse gases are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, greenhouse gasses are bound up inextricably with climate change, which indicates they lead to both global crisis and government interventions. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between systematic changes and electric cars as well as an exponential increase in sea levels. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of non-governmental organizations is correlated positively with not only climate change but also global warming.
Within the realm of environmental science, without the slightest doubt, arid zones attribute to greenhouse gasses, in that it would come down to carbon footprint, carbon dioxide, and hotter temperatures. A salient example of such attribution is ozone layer depletion, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take ecosystem for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint environmental problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to polar bears, thermal radiation, and even weather conditions. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of carbon emissions.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that greenhouse gasses are of the high importance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-03 | viviana | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | pbdarab | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | pbdarab | 85 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing??What are the reasons for that? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81003584229 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28181171786 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695340501792 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7995144841 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.083333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835245788916 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237534488385 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371742739562 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0507251737966 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465661838446 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.94827586207 216% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.