If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change in the North Pole and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of bringing polluting in our atmosphere into halt is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly by both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that global warming can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, changing the weather patterns in the North Pole can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the greenhouse gases, as well as the destruction of the ozone layer, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influences of acid rain on the North Pole. Thus, beneficial ramifications by both emission of toxic gases and rising the atmosphere temperature can be seen.
Within the realm of threatening the marine eco-system, climate changes might increase the consequences of a wide variety of incurable disease. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the industrialization relate to this reality that the demerits of fossil fuels pertain to the urbanization. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of melting ice cabs correlated negatively with rising the sea level. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the contamination of the North Pole.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of halting the climate change in the North Pole far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of imposing stricter legislation prove the significance of using public transport systems, but also pinpoint using a renewable source of energy implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-03 | viviana | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | pbdarab | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | pbdarab | 85 | view |
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 80
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 80
- Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- Some people think that TV is a source of information and education. Others believe that TV is useful for entertainment only. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enewable source of energy implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41059602649 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17374044205 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629139072848 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6669580411 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.166666667 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0456661054201 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0155681449086 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0158549082146 0.071462118173 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0262662873706 0.151781067708 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00821589427157 0.0609392437508 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.