Imitating celebrities in sports and movies is good or bad?
Surely, there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals sports and movies is good or bad for common person it has been one of the prominent topic in contemporary discussion people has always held some conflicting views on this. This essay will discuss both of the ornament.
On the one hand, I would like to say that lots of movies are motivational and remember our ancient culture. Celebrities are in our blood. Furthermore, in this day age media and sports personality are the heroes. They are everywhere on the billboards, in newspapers, on TV and internet. This has earned them many more fans and millions of fans who try to imitate everything that they do, is a positive development.
On the other hand, imitating movies and sports personalities are nothing unusual but unfortunately it is not always good. A large number of our celebrities does not set good example. Many of them know for the wasteful lifestyle. Wafer thin models promote unhealthy eating habits. Anorexia has become a major health issue these days
After analyzing, the situation, it is not hard to see that admiring and imitating films and sports personalities who do not set a good example is bad.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-01-22 | Nina Tsarevich | 78 | view |
2021-05-08 | rejeesh | 49 | view |
2020-04-24 | Kanika Aggarwal | 77 | view |
2020-01-22 | gobindh Singh | 89 | view |
2020-01-14 | Sinabri | 80 | view |
- Important for students to study literature and history 72
- parents responsibly 55
- prr 11
- In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. some people regard this as completely wrong while other consider it is valuable work experience, important foe learning and taking responsibility. what is your opinion? 69
- It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to another political figure science and mathematics. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...ut unfortunately it is not always good. A large number of our celebrities does not set good examp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who do not set a good example is bad.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89302325581 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82343587794 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613953488372 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.1689126258 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9230769231 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 7.25397266985 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352215375676 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974935380273 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104756294275 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205132331022 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624279810118 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.