Involve employees in decision-making
In this day and age, decision-making in companies has become controversial topic among public all around the world, it is a widely held view that employees should not be involved in decision, while I tend to believe that it is better to involve employees in decision-making meetings.
From psychological point of view, decisions in companies are indeed inbound to employee involvement, which means it might lead to both more satisfaction and higher productivity, For instance a group of reputable psychologists working at prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between employee involvement and other measure, Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that involve employees in company decisions is positively correlated with not only satisfaction but also they would be more happy with their jobs.
From economic terms, employees involvement in company decision are undoubtedly attributable to increase productivity, in that it would lead to more benefit for company , a well know example of such attribution is a research done by Tehran university which has shown that employees can bring in new ideas in decision making meetings. ,Thus involvement of employees could play a significant role in favorable future of company.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, my personal sentiment is that the benefit of involve every person in company in decision meeting far outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-13 | amirnaji24 | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly correlated with not only satisfaction but also they would be more happy with t...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t would lead to more benefit for company , a well know example of such attribution...
^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... new ideas in decision making meetings. ,Thus involvement of employees could pla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... ,Thus involvement of employees could play...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62995594714 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24886039636 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629955947137 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6551724138 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 20.5024630542 219% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 165.281093898 50.4703680194 327% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 255.6 104.977214359 243% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.4 20.9669160288 217% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.25397266985 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515581157038 0.242375264174 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.286155149096 0.0925447433944 309% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133128544433 0.071462118173 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323255778271 0.151781067708 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145032970946 0.0609392437508 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.8 12.6369458128 220% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 8.88 53.1260098522 17% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.54236453202 243% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.2 10.9458128079 212% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.26 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 32.0 9.94827586207 322% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.3980295567 192% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.