Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of replacing large shopping malls instead of small shops and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of accessibility of the complex buildings is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the popularity of the mega malls can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the complex centers can provide the society with some effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of being easy to access as well as being convenience for purchasing are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed academic experiment which discovered the influence of having a large park space on decreasing the traffic congestion. Thus the beneficial ramifications of both saving time and having a recreational center for children apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social science, buying from large malls might increase the consequences of fulfilling the basic needs with reasonable price. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of locating far from the city center could relate to this reality that the demerit of requiring vast area to construction is pertain to putting much investment on building a large mall. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of expensive products is correlated with imposition of heavy tax. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being so busy place.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of replacing the mega malls instead of local shops far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of having this opportunity to select our products readily prove the significance of a complex building, but also pinpoint practical implications.
- The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 80
- It is believed that some people are born with creativity and specific talents. However, it's sometimes claimed that taught developed creativity, and any child can become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas. 80
- Mass media like TV, newspaper, and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? you agree or disagree. 80
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion. 77
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems...so who do u think Should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e on decreasing the traffic congestion. Thus the beneficial ramifications of both sa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'pertained'.
Suggestion: pertained
... requiring vast area to construction is pertain to putting much investment on building ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 318.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3679245283 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07333754456 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616352201258 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8163876986 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175754776721 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598529632968 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647708355923 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10361197642 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508791340404 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.