Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Nowadays, law enforcement has become a long-running dispute among the public all over that world, which leads to moot question “whether regulations can change human behavior or not?”. It is a widely held view that obtaining proper legislation is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that adjusting accurate laws plays a vital role in the behavior of each society. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the crime rate will be diminished and the motivation of committing the offense decreases. Secondly, it can be argued that the prevalence of some perilous crimes, such as embezzlement, theft, corruption that cause damaging consequences decrease in the communities. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that the majority of laws are efficient, including the traffic light and fastening seatbelt that guarantee the people’s lives. A very tangible example to illustrate would be Thailand that smuggling the drugs is excessively prevail, while the government could control it by tougher law.
However, there is no doubt that law enforcement provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that the fear will be developed in the society due to the death penalty or prolonged captivations. Moreover, it is quite clear that the criminals will be encouraged to revenge after prison and the violence and aggressive behavior might be raised. A group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted that widespread use of tough regulations may deprive others of their civic rights.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that obtaining laws in order to change people’s manner must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 88
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example. 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 88
- The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems on our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issu 78
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Nowadays, law enforcement has become a long-running dispute among the public all over that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prevailed'.
Suggestion: prevailed
...that smuggling the drugs is excessively prevail, while the government could control it ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 5.94088669951 269% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 319.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39498432602 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09447739243 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633228840125 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7478646339 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1756911415 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521613962679 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658814217525 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103248192845 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418273520696 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.