Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of law influences on human behaviour and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of regulations is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that imposing law can have a positive impact on mankind's behaviour and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the legal standpoint, legislation can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that being disciplined as well as responsibility, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that law act as a deterrent to harmful human's content. Thus, the beneficial consequences of being disciplined as well as being responsible apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social behaviour, regulation might increase the consequences of committing a crime. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of delinquencies related to this reality that the demerits of strict laws pertain to the eager of committing a crime despite the limited regulation. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of strict limitations are correlated negatively with crime commitment rate. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived the notion of negative impacts of laws on criminals.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of legislation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of structured behaviour prove the significance of law, but also pinpoint reduction of crime implications.
- Global warming is one of the most important issues that the world is facing today. What are the causes of global warming and what measure can government and individuals take to tackle the issue? 73
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 77
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Which do you prefer use specific reason to develop your essay. 70
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management e 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63235294118 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34763996557 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1316894135 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149978810497 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504749579122 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042813318286 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810769548006 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254634743879 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.