Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of the effect of law in changing human behavior, and its
corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the
matter of rigid rules is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive
and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that social
regulations can be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the impact of the law on human behavior can provide the society
with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that public arena, as well as ethical
issues, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university
student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered social phenomenon are
critical. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both stringent rules and identity crises apparently
can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, law influence on human behavior might increase the
consequences of spiritual development. Moreover, fundamental aspects of human endeavor
relate to this reality that the demerits of social inequality pertain to parliamentary procedure.
As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has
asserted that the downside of the arbitrary rules is correlated negatively with cultural
background. Consequently, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of committing
crimes.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe
that the benefits of the impact of the law on human behavior far outweigh its drawbacks. Not
only do the advantages of legal rules prove the significance of cultural achievement, but also
pinpoints moral implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-01 | Mohammad1364 | 79 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 88
- Whether experimental learning/practical learning can work well in formal education/traditional teaching, agree or disagree?orExperience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree? 88
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 79
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 79
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68401486989 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25098834969 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617100371747 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2556931791 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.12807881773 484% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253540045279 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799499856863 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819553115733 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625955904001 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106226243333 0.0609392437508 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.