The mass media including TV, Radio and newspaper influence our society and shape our opinions and characters. What is your opinion?
The influence of mass media on our opinions and social characters has sparked a controversy around the globe. Although specific arguments claim that family character plays more in child behaviour, a group of intellectuals debate otherwise and hold opponent's view. I am highly inclined to believe that radio, television, newspapers, as well as social networking, shape our minds and social characters. The agenda of this article is discussing advantages and disadvantages of mass media influences and will lead to a legitimate conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why mass media impact' society are supported, but the most remarkable one lies in the fact that CNN predictions about the results of US presidential election have never been wrong except in 2016. Moreover, a recent longitudinal study by a group of profound social psychologists in an eminent university revealed that President Donald Trump won the election by using social mass media such as Twitter and Instagram. Hence, the influences of Facebook, Instagram, radio, and television programs on many aspects of our life can be seen with clarity.
Contrary to people belief, there remain drawbacks of trusting social media clouded up some positive positive impacts, but the most alarming one rooted in TV and newspapers have not covered different views of the news. For example, when I was a child the Iraq war news was not exactly the same between local reporters who published in Instagram and professional Reuters' reporters. So the adverse effects of fake news on social trust, news policy, people's vote, and opposition parties are obvious.
To recapitulate, while there are several divergent opinions on both sides, my sentiment is that the advantages of using mass media to affect social awareness take more credence that its potential disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | gupta-vikas | 72 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | bita_harzandi@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | w.eldemardash@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | bibivtvt21 | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | bibivtvt21 | 11 | view |
- Working and living abroad helps us to know other cultures well. How far you think working abroad has good or bad impacts on our cultural lives? 77
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own 85
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion?Support it with personal examples. 80
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experiences. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: positive
...f trusting social media clouded up some positive positive impacts, but the most alarming one root...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35862068966 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91181528468 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648275862069 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9821526538 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.272727273 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253746902586 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912980830668 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884091267892 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137565356275 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822132277066 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.