Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Or Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy or helps to live long life and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that medical technology helps to live long life for society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, curse or blessing for society and mankind by medical technology for the human's life expectancy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the human's life expectancy and live long life by medical technology in society might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of medical technology is a responsible cure and blessing for society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | saeidazizi | 88 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Or Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind? 88
- some say that music is as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...dical technology is responsible for the humans life expectancy or helps to live long l...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...d mankind by medical technology for the humans life expectancy can provide the society...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...Within the realm of a public arena, the humans life expectancy and live long life by m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64912280702 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2025997442 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59298245614 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0218369287 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.363636364 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412829422702 0.242375264174 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144411187256 0.0925447433944 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159428648294 0.071462118173 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239017895908 0.151781067708 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830212511284 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.