Recently, the phenomenon of unlimited access to electronic books through internet and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of leaving written books is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that online data can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, using e-books and abandoning libraries and can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that saving time, as well as higher motivation, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered importance of web suffering. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both network connection and globalization apparently can be seen.
Within the reals of up to date knowledge, substituting old-fashioned books with new technologies might increase the consequences of sustainable development. Moreover, fundamental aspects of network connection relate to this reality that the demerits of written contexts pertain to lack of smart insight. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of traditional learning is correlated negatively with superficial knowledge. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of online publications.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using online texts instead of traditional library books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of internet search prove the significance of unlimited resources, but also pinpoint technological implications.
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- . Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate (eliminate) this? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7962962963 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34620764809 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67037037037 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7677026375 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.416666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109646908289 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350553154408 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356461385853 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063797063554 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201569272883 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.