One of the most discussed topics today is that more information is available online causing reduced usage for library books. I firmly agree with the statement above. Some people say that information is available online so library books are useless while others maintain that library books are useful. In this essay, books are not useless will be discussed with below 2 points.
At the outset, there are innumerable reasons that people think that books are useless but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that with the advancement in technology, people started relying on internet. The reason for this is, a significant amount of information is available online, where a simple google search retrieves hundreds of links for accessing. As an illustration, a recent international study revealed that 70% of the people search internet for knowing something new. Nevertheless, this never led to closure of any library.
I feel just as convinced that people have become lazy with this advancement. I often argue that in fact, reading books from the library will help us to understand the author's point of view in a clearer manner, even if it is an academic book. Additionally, reading books will not have any strain on the eyes. A recent report shows that people using internet have increased chances of getting eye related problems than those who prefer reading books.
After analysing both the drawbacks and benefits, it can be concluded that although enormous amount of information is available in the internet, yet the happiness of reading the books from library can never be ignored. It is also shown that people still prefer to read books to avoid eye stress. Furthermore, it is expected that this trend continues in the future.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: nav12345
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, i feel, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02797202797 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65761868276 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548951048951 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1007297502 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.875 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.25397266985 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319065904353 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993381240463 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109742977961 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202395782288 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174005660819 0.0609392437508 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.