Modern world products and services put extra costs on families. This has led to many of mothers work besides their husbands for their children’s welfare. Although some individuals hold the view that working of both parents may cause problems in children upbringing, others believe parents can pay enough attention to their children as well as work outside.
Some people argue that working of both parents is not good for children because of some important reasons. At first, their children may have not appropriate upbringing. Parents don’t spend enough time for children. Thus, they can’t educate necessary life lessons. This lack may direct children to criminal activities. In addition, children may get moral sicknesses. It is because they feel lonely without any support in the crisis time. The loneliness of children degrades their self-confidence and self-esteem. Self-confidence shortage can affect their future life.
However, opponents are of the opinion that both parents can work outside without any problem at home. To begin, they say parents can adjust their daily hours to have enough time for their children. Mothers or both parents can work part time. They also can make an accurate daily plan for all family members to use their time more effective and efficient. Furthermore, parents can register necessary courses which cover children’s educational needs to both life and school skills. Occupied parents have enough money to spend extra courses costs.
To conclude, though some people believe working of both parents is not useful for children, others don’t believe in it. In my opinion, the career of both parents is necessary only if it does not harm children’s life in any way. My 2 years child has extra costs which make my wife and I work together. Of course, his living will need more money in future. Providing necessary facilities and support for children’s progress needs enough money. Anyway, I hope parents can make the balance between work and family affairs.
- Modern technology is now very common in many work places.How do you think this has changed the way we worked?Do you think there are disadvantages to reply too much on technology? 11
- Most modern families have both parents working and as a result children spend less and less time with their parents.What is the reason for this?What problems can this cause? 77
- ]Modern technology is now very common in most work places.How do you think this has changed the way we work?Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? 80
- Most modern families have both parents working and as a result children spend less and less time with their parents.What is the reason for this?What problems can this cause? 77
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media.What do you think is the reason for the growth in the rate of juvenile crime?What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... pay enough attention to their children as well as work outside. Some people argue that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...dren. Mothers or both parents can work part time. They also can make an accurate daily p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...course, his living will need more money in future. Providing necessary facilities and sup...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, besides, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, in addition, of course, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 321.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33956386293 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75459880187 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526479750779 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 12.6551724138 190% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3617957296 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4166666667 104.977214359 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.375 20.9669160288 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 2.91625615764 411% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339505651866 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107889967006 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671713392138 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238840396822 0.151781067708 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589897487357 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.