There’s no denying how important a role the mother plays in the upbringing of her children. But torn by modern economics, mothers are leaving home for professional practice, raising the question “who now takes care of the
children?” In my belief, though,all efforts to replace the proverbial mother are destined to be futile.
Observing Nature, scientifically or other wise, tells us that being a mother, if it were a social role, is ideally possible by the child bearing female and others may only be nurses or patrons. The physiological and psychological exclusiveness of the mother means all the other social entities and all the greatness of science and civilization can only supplement, and never replace, her part in the upbringing of children. Any one else trying to don her role is simply unnatural. But of course there is opinion in the contrary also. Modern science flaunts its age old practice of replicating nature and natural processes. Now more than ever humans and their society are evolving frequently against the tide of Nature, and civilization sustains
this evolution. Such evolution has also effected the socio-economic distinction of men and women. Now in the industry women are producing as much as men do. So “women are better off in the house” is no longer true.
While such human evolution is true and should morally be supported, going against Mother Nature, when we’re clearly not in a position to, is immoral. Science has not yet found a biological and psycho-social alternative for the natural mother. And while gender equality is great, it never means fusion of the two poles of our species. I don’t believe science never has strived to eliminate sex because it is simply impracticable. So men and women, so uniformly productive as they recently are, don’t have to utilize their worth in the same end of civilization.
If one person, or sex, is naturally gifted to play a special and vital role in the society, it is her duty to thrive in it. I therefore conclude that in a child’s life its mother is
irreplaceable, and, hence, it is she who should rear her child.
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 72
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write , but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree. 77
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on peoples life and work? 70
- There are more men or women in certain jobs and there s nothing we can change about it Do you agree with that 77
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write , but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , all
...he children?' In my belief, though,all efforts to replace the proverbial mothe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: OTHER_WISE_OTHERWISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'otherwise'?
Suggestion: otherwise
... Observing Nature, scientifically or other wise, tells us that being a mother, if it we...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 425, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Anyone'?
Suggestion: Anyone
...her part in the upbringing of children. Any one else trying to don her role is simply u...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 529, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...course there is opinion in the contrary also. Modern science flaunts its age old pra...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.5418719212 218% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 8.36945812808 239% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1207.87684729 149% => OK
No of words: 355.0 242.827586207 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07605633803 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02797378997 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 139.433497537 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597183098592 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 379.143842365 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.931034482759 644% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2206572548 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 7.25397266985 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.12807881773 170% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 2.91625615764 274% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20802112079 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625498871894 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608594670174 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107962314122 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598047713897 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.